I read the blog "Tomorrow (http://domani.arcoiris.tv/ogni-epoca-ha-la-riforma-che-si-merita-la-riforma-alfano-merita-berlusconi/) in the section The letter "a very good article by a retired Judge Norberto Lenzi calm in tone and easy to understand even for us non-experts.
Every era has its reform it deserves, reform Alfano Berlusconi deserves
We're not sure living in the era of the Renaissance, much less in the Enlightenment, so, given the opacity and the misery of the times in which we live, the so-called reform of the justice can also be defined era.
propaganda any hint of triumphalism and defiance when he says: try to show that this reform, which is necessary for all citizens, may explain its effects directly or indirectly on the processes of Berlusconi. Someone will replicate that it may still be revenge, not yet counted among the theological virtues, but this is not the point.
Berlusconi did not engage in a battle so long and complicated, although there would be kept as a grandson of Gelli, if he had in view an immediate self-interest that is reflected again, always and inexorably on its processes. No need to be careful observers of the political savvy and Italian to realize that the purpose of this reform with Berlusconi (which exacerbate political confrontation, which will surely broken some reaction to the provocation of the judiciary) is to create a climate in which red-hot, with mastery of the media which is capable of and with the means it possesses, the furious attacks on the judiciary sloth only able to look through the keyhole, making it easy to pass by ordinary law the prescription quick and root canal treatment interceptions, making the rooms predictably feeble calls for the Head of State to the Concordia. (It is curious that in this world supertechnological, in which the holes of the locks do not exist anymore, only the PM remained so stubbornly backward to search for one). On
points covered by the reform there has already been much debate in the past whenever this has been tried or proposed. Briefly we can say that the separation of the careers of judges does not match the old technique of divide and rule, in which the split remained so weak but always self against the divider, but the most advanced technique of divide and includes, being quite clear that the PM would be somehow brought back into the orbit of the executive (perhaps the lesser of two evils when you consider what could combine this isolated monad-free culture of control and jurisdiction). The shamelessness
more are consumed to the detriment of CSM, which is described as a body protector of a caste of untouchables. It is unnecessary to point out the numerous punitive measures for judges and compare them with those involving other professions, not to mention the politicians who have never received any request for the arrest of a member of Parliament.
do not need to observe that over a third of its members are political appointees. Yet I would be curious to see the reactions of the Order of accountants Societies or Councils if they were imposed the presence of two judges and two regional directors with voting rights. Even in those forums discussing irregularities and non-virtuous behavior as well as in CSM, but no one else we can put your nose. It would be interesting to a survey.
Then remove the police from the functional dependence of PM means taking the initiative in these investigations and allow them to do only the processes resulting from allegations of a police force employed by the executive. It means that to enable the process to a politician only if they are policemen, suicide bombers willing to ruin his career.
As for civil liability of magistrates, questioned why "Are the only ones who do not pay when they are wrong," it is unlawful for anyone to be punished who has stolen his duty of fairness and due diligence, but it is not acceptable to be tossed on the first page three or four misconduct seen in 50 years 10,000 three judges. It 's too easy, if they can find dozens, but this can not be de-legitimize the entire category.
Nobody asked lawyers on behalf of the arrest of Previti, and nobody has taken action against the clinic S. Rita Milan for the crimes of a few doctors.
now "almost all" of judges who behave properly, as the PDL can be punished for the conduct "Some fringe subversive"? It seems so.
0 comments:
Post a Comment